Defending the Honor of Hal Roach Against the Ignorance of Christies


In an otherwise terrific piece by Barbara Hoffman in today’s New York Post about a new Basquiat auction and showing at Christies, I came across this humdinger in a quote by Christies’ VP Jonathan Laib about a Basquiat work called “Famous Negro Athletes”:

“The crown [depicted in the work] is said to be taken from the film company that made the Little Rascals, which is completely racist”.*

Well, “the film company that made The Little Rascals” is discovered easily enough by Googling — take ya two seconds. It’s Hal Roach Studios, of course (and later, MGM). Neither of these companies used a crown in their logo. If I had to guess I would venture that it was a reference to the logo for the Negro baseball league’s Kansas City Monarchs:


They don’t have researchers or fact checkers at either Christie’s auction house or the New York Post?


Worse than that, the statement amounts to an outrageous and incorrect slander. Mr. Laib may know a lot about art (though judging from his high appraisal of a Pepto Bismal bottle with a dollop of paint on it by Basquiat, I doubt it), but he sure doesn’t know much about the history of American popular culture.

By contemporary standards, yes, the characters of Sunshine Sammy, Farina, Buckwheat and Stymie play like stereotypes — but in the 1920s, 30s and 40s, the Our Gang/ Little Rascals series was at the very vanguard of progressive race relations in mainstream American culture. An entirely INTEGRATED gang of friends who play together, help each other, share candy, have each others backs? This, in the age of the Ku Klux Klan??? Of “Strange Fruit” and lynchings?  And Sunshine Sammy, by the way, was the first African American ever signed to a long term movie contract. This was Hal Roach’s vision — WAY ahead of the curve of the rest of the country at the time….this includes the other movie studios, vaudeville (which was segregated), professional sports, any other realm you care to name.  So it is REALLY unfair to dismiss him and this movie series as “completely racist”. “Racist,” yes — except for the entire REST of the country which was way MORE racist. You stand corrected, Mr. Laib.

(And I love Basquiat, by the way. I am just not too impressed by that Pepto Bismal bottle).

*The remark is among the picture descriptions; scroll up to it with the arrows.

For more on comedy  film history don’t miss my new book: Chain of Fools: Silent Comedy and Its Legacies from Nickelodeons to Youtube, just released by Bear Manor Mediaalso available from etc etc etc


To learn more about vaudevilleconsult No Applause, Just Throw Money: The Book That Made Vaudeville Famous, available at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and wherever nutty books are sold.


2 Responses to “Defending the Honor of Hal Roach Against the Ignorance of Christies”

  1. This in off the grapevine. I’m hearing that the logo for King World Syndicate, distributor of the Little Rascals to television, may have had a crown logo. Which partially addresses one issue, and the other not at all!

  2. Often people’s idea of early 20th century culture is very…black and white (no pun intended). They see these old stereotypical depictions and they instantly dismiss the films without giving them a closer look. Sometimes, a closer look is necessary–because it wasn’t ALL ugliness ALL the time, folks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: